Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Annulment vs. Divorce

In this post I’m not going to discuss the inner workings of how a Divorce in California works, unless it is helpful to understanding the differences between a divorce or a dissolution action and an Annulment or Nullity action.  I am going to discuss why an annulment would be a good option in certain situations, but may not be possible most of the time.  This post is to give you an overall picture of the grounds for an annulment and not to go into specific facts required under each category.



      
Why would someone want to get an annulment vs. a divorce?
  • If you are married an annulment sounds like a great option because the result of an annulment is that it’s like the marriage never happened.  So if you are against divorce for religious reasons, if you get an annulment, you were never married making it impossible for you to get a divorce.  In other words, the marriage becomes void. 
  • If you file for Divorce, you have to deal with the six months and a day cooling off period before your divorce can be final.  For an annulment there is no such waiting period before your marriage is declared void.
  • It may be possible in an Annulment action to prevent the other party from seeking support orders, division of property, attorney’s fees, etc. 
  • Unlike Divorce, there is no statutory residency requirement. 
  • Unlike Divorce, you don’t need to get consent from the opposing party or enter their default. 

How can I get an Annulment in California?

The first step in getting an Annulment in California is finding particular grounds for the annulment otherwise you will have to file a petition for dissolution or legal separation.  The grounds for an Annulment in California are as follows:
  • ·         Void Marriages (Void from the very beginning)

o   Incest (California Family Code § 2200, “Marriages between parents and children, ancestors and descendants of every degree, and between brothers and sisters of the half as well as the whole blood, and between uncles and nieces or aunts and nephews, are incestuous, and void from the beginning, whether the relationship is legitimate or illegitimate.”) (emphasis added)
o   Bigamy (California Family Code § 2201, “A subsequent marriage contracted by a person during the life of a former husband or wife of the person, with a person other than the former husband or wife, is illegal and void from the beginning…) (emphasis added)
  • ·         Voidable Marriages (this marriage is voidable at the option of one of the parties)

o   Minority (California Family Code § 2210, “The party who commences the proceeding or on whose behalf the proceeding is commenced was without the capability of consenting to the marriage.”)  This means that the minor and the spouse did not get the proper consents before getting married.  There are exceptions to this rule.
o   Unsound Mind (California Family Code § 2210, “Either party was of unsound mind, unless the party of unsound mind, after coming to reason, freely cohabited with the other as husband and wife.”)  So if the person claiming unsound mind figures out what has happened then decides to cohabit with the spouse, the marriage is no longer voidable.
o   Fraud    (California Family Code § 2210, “The consent of either party was obtained by fraud, unless the party whose consent was obtained by fraud afterwards, with full knowledge of the facts constituting the fraud, freely cohabited with the other as husband or wife.”)  Fraud vitiates consent. 
o   Force (California Family Code § 2210)  This is pretty straight forward.  If someone is forced to get married there is no consent.  There is some case law that states that threats may be sufficient if they took away a parties ability to consent to the marriage. 
o   Physical Incapacity (California Family Code § 2210, “Either party was, at the time of marriage, physically incapable of entering into the marriage state, and that incapacity continues, and appears to be incurable.”

Problem with an Annulment in California is a Problem of Proof

As you can see in the above lists of void and voidable marriages and annulment is available as a remedy in limited situations.  I don’t think that being drunk in Las Vegas can vitiate the consent required.  (Although, this might be worth doing some research on in another blog post.)  The problem of proof in these situations remains.  Are you able to prove with accurate facts to the court that you have grounds for an annulment?  This is why annulment actions tend to be highly contested and more expensive because there is a premium on proving for example, unsound mind, or fraud.  There is a lot at stake as well because the responding party may lose their ability to receive support in some cases. 
If you need assistance with your annulment case or any family law or divorce matter please visit my website at www.lawofficeofbarrydwitt.com



No comments:

Post a Comment